PASCO HERNANDO COMMUNITY COLLEGE

 

WESTERN CIVILIZATION (EUH 1000) CLASS NOTES

 

.    Instructor: Dave Tamm / Term: Spring 2008    .

 

 

THE EXPANSION OF EUROPE (34) (THE THAW-900-1300)

But the carolingian world was battered by muslims magyars and vikings!

But it was divided in the 9th Century! But the high middle ages begin.

The Thaw. Bouyant optimism. Europe's optimism strikes out against its

neighbors in the crusades.

 

New States: A great arc of new states: from the Celtic world --

through Scandinavia and through the Slavic world.

 

Economic growth, architectural dynamism: the romanesque and then the

gothic, all over Europe. Unpredictable in 800.

 

This 900 through 1300 was one of the longest periods of sustained

growth (in nearly all aspects of life) in human history. Remarkable,

and became the background for the cultural achievements.

 

Why did it happen? 1) Rise in population. During Carolingian period,

pop rose (750s - 1050), and even more 1050-1200. leveled off in 1300.

So, larger families. More babies surviving, people living longer. no

plague or famine. warm dry climate. lots of new land was brought under

cultivation (not for no reason, to feed mouths). Diets got better,

crops  were good: full of iron and protean. Cereal production. They

invented the best farming before the advent of fertilization. How?

Horses were implemented as draft animal replacing the Ox. he does more

work, is stronger, for less food. fields plowed more times, soil

turned easier. different harnessing, horse collar. hooves of horses

had to be shod... but gave protection to the horse's hooves. But if we

are gonna shoe these guys, we need iron. metallurgy. Heavy wheeled

plow invented in the Slavic world. took up in western europe too. used

in 11th century. good because horse can do more work, and was much

better than roman scratchplow. aerates soil better. more iron needed.

smithing. water mills used since 11th C: mills demanded engineering

gains in gears. A flow of water can push a parallel wheel, but not

well. A perpendicular wheel can work better, but i must do some

hydralic engineering! think swiss family robinson. we need mills cause

of grain... all circular! population, grain (bread), grinding, water

wheel, land farming...

 

And Land use: during classical times, an area was farmed intensely

then move a few miles. farm, move. now they farmed same land, but 2

field agriculture. farm half and let animals eat and dump the other

half. enrichment. household waste put there too. half of land one

year, half another. Carolingians used 3-field on church and

carolingian estates. This spreads all over by the year 1000 or 1050,

everyone uses it. Divide land into 3 equal parts, one is fallow, one

planted with winter crops, one planted with spring crops. From 50% to

66% right away, and a better cycle. one lost crop wont wipe you out.

 

People eat oats in Brittany and Scotland only. horses eat oats. i need

some oats too. this is a problem, but now with 3 field i can grow oats

for the horses too.

 

Also, agricultural specialization increases. People in areas with

viticulture grew grapes and grapevines. Others cereal grains, and if a

given region is going to specialize... then they will rely on trade to

get the things they don't do. trade... roads... 4 wheeled wagons, no

more two wheeled cart... and far flung urban markets to buy into the

economy of the country.

 

technological innovation. Roman period saw not much tech increase, but

Medieval period did. flip the polarity of Roman Light - Medieval Dark!

Evidence?

 

Church and secular govt. encouraged trade and protected it. And after

the crusades, other products from far away, spices etc. would become

luxury products. The medieval trading infrastructure develops

further... into the modern. Inference on pop. increase? yes. But but

the train of inferences is a sound one.

 

ECONOMICS

Fairs! Champagne's summer fair moved from town to town there in

Champagne, from the south and north both. Centers for growth of trade.

all overland until 14C., but on rivers and roads. After 14th C by

ship. Other fairs? Niznhy Novgorod. Hansa in baltic. england's south

had a league of cities too. commercial interests were looked after.

contracts are a byproduct of this stuff- partnership and corporations

too! "if we work together we can pool wealth and be stronger than one

by ourselves: and risk is spread out: if i own a share in a ship and

the ship sinks, ive lost something. If I own the ship, I lose

everything. Insurance was sold as well as a subsidiary. Productively

parasitical things grew and spread. Entrapraneurship.

 

Commercial networks emerge. Hanseatic League: Britain to Russia. Up

and down the Rhine, Danube and Rhone, these were networks too. Italian

cities linked up too, had networks in Mediterranean. Eastern

Mediterranean went through central asia to china, and seabourn routes.

Riverine routes too.

 

Surface mining. No deep mining cause you could not get the water out

of the shafts. you just couldnt. But surface mining was ok, and it was

like quarrying. Not metal but stone. Look at the Medieval churches :

all stone in 12 and 13C. Iron though, was one metal that was mined

for.

 

TOWNS

Money went into circulation, more money. Towns. Fairs. Early medieval

town were there cause there was a count there (governmental see) or a

cathedral town (bishop's see), or a monestary was there. Some grew

furburgs (suburbs) gathered on edge during Carolingian time. Then

merchants began to settle permenantly there. And town air breaths free

(see gierard). towns are economic engines driving the growth of

Europe. trade and industry (artisan industry), tanning etc. along with

gov't and religious centers, and now intellectual university centers,

they took on the life of people and economics.

 

Town people need different things. peace, security, order, predictable

raw materials, supplies of materials. Peace in the countryside too,

something that swashbuckling nobles were not too interested in. But

city walls went up and grew. These changed economic circumstances

purduced reflection on life and economics: people knew more about rich

vs. poor. new religious orders came in to minister to the poor.

 

Usury was needed now, to raise capital. if i am gonna loan you money

for your business, i want something in return. theologians justified

it finally by saying you were paying for 'risk', not for borrowing

their money. also, what is the just price? whatever the market will

bear? whatever i can get away with? cost of goods plus labor that went

into it?

 

So, Europe in the high middle ages was dynamic and prosperous, more so

than anytime since pax romana, and would be again in modern times.

 

Remember: when you study the West, you are doing something heroic for

our civilization and its preservation.

 

 

CHIVALRY (35)

who are these people? we see there are more of them, and they were

being more prosperous. King Alfred the Great said "a kingdom needs men

who fight, men who pray and men who work." 3 classes therefore. this

left out townpeople, though they were a dynamic feature. to Work was

to work the soil, not the tanners in town. Women? no, minorities? no.

This was a christendom thing.

 

THOSE WHO FIGHT

the nobility. royal families only the most distinctive of the many

noble families from all over the realm. Primogeniture rule: first born

sons get the title and inheritance. Lineage is now a huge deal: who

are your great ancestors? What about the other kids? No title or

office, or land endowment for everyone, so many young sons are cut

loose and they go into towns, clergy, or... crusades.

 

Also, now great families tried to create compact chunks of land, with

a large residence, and take a surname from the land or castle they

built. A self consciousness of belonging to a family or place.

 

Several noble levels: king and truly great nobles: people who could

operate on the kingdom wide scale. Then local powerful families... and

then knights. Knights had to find a lord to support them, to work to

find an office... or younger sons of the high status family. Nobility

was the governing class of Europe. Monopolized office holding in state

and in church. Served under kings and as a bridge between kings and

peasants. They had the ethos of Chivalry. Chival is a horse.

"Horsiness" code of conduct appropriate to men who ride and have

horses. A code of men for men, not men for women, that is later on.

Prowess. A warrior who was not a good soldier was useless. Didn't

matter if you were a 'nice guy'. You had to have battle prowess.

Loyalty, generousness, and courage. Give things freely in this world,

be brave in battle.

 

SONG OF ROLAND

We can see this code of conduct in the Song of Roland. The French

national epic, and we know the event that stands behind it... in 778

Charlemagne fought raiders in northern spain, and on the way back over

the pyrannes Basque terrorists stole his baggage. 300 years later that

event was chronicled in the Song of Roland (the guy guarding the

baggage). The equivalent to the action movie of the middle ages. Meant

to appeal to men and boys like that. The same demographic. Great

Roland dies, the fiancee dies of sadness right away. Long loving

descriptions of weapons- guy stuff like guys talking about their golf

clubs or cars. This is the ethos of chivalry.

 

THOSE WHO PRAY

The clergy (everyone prayed) but the pros here... but problem: are

monks or bishops closer to God? Well, it was some or another of the

clergy anyway. Clergy became more and more aristocratic, pulled from

aristocratic families. The noble 2nd sons of great families, again,

was one reason. Secure life, decent diet, nice place to live, enormous

prestige, good education... not bad! Very desirable career. Convents

provided opportunities for women. Women governed other women, were

educated, and acceptable alternative lifestyle to marriage... a

convent was a desirable place for many many women.

 

The state is Christendom, so clergy is very important. They had good

connections. Clergy shares the same values as nobility, because these

are the families they are from, and they still have uncles dads

brothers etc. there! When we encounter "worldly" clergy in literature,

we say "hmm, these clergy do not seem to be living a particularly holy

life..." well they weren't, they were sharing the culture and values

of the nobility! Living the kind of life people of their class lived!

 

Clergy was hierarchical, pope, bishops, priests, and encouraged that

in society, king, lords, vassals.

 

CLUNY AND REFORMS

In 910 a monestary was founded by William of Acquitine, free of all

lay control, even of the family who founded it, and placed under the

jurisdiction of the pope. It had abbots of enormous prestige, and it

came to exert a large amount of influence on monestaries all over

Europe. It was called Cluny. In the 10C, like Gortsau in Lorraine,

Hirtsau in Germany, Worchester, England, powerful Cluniak reforms went

around. "The essential telos of religous office is to leave, to

abandon the world and its troubles. The church should be uncoupled

from the state totally." Others from inside said, "No! Role of clergy

is to engage the world, engage the powerful and get them to change

things for the better."

 

1. Cistercian monks (from Cito in France) were a strict reform. "Cluny

is too worldly! Go back to the Rule of St. Benedict and follow it in

its purest form. St. Bernard of Clairveaux was the great figure from

here, in 11C.

 

Aramitic (Hermit) monks in Italy, France and England, really tried to

physically separate selves from the world.

Canons (who work in cathedral churches) worked to make cathedrals more

like monestaries.

 

Crusades had a weird fighters: a particularly medieval phenemenon:

armed knights who were monks. Knights Templars, Knights Hospitallers.

Teutonic Knights. Followed a 'Rule'.

 

Mendicants: begging order. Franciscans were these, people would live

without wealth, without marks of status, or prestige, worked with the

poor and sick and downtrodden. By leading blameless lives, could have

a reach that powerful, rich and worldly could not.

 

Mendicants: Dominicans worked with heretics and those who fell away

from the teachings of the church.

 

Soldier of Christ is the best medieval soldier. He who will only fight

in a good cause, fighting God's enemies. in 10C they promoted the

peace of God, "no war during Christmas or Easter, no war on Sunday, no

war in or near a Church, no war on civilians.

 

This legitimated the Crusades.

 

Well, clergy brought people face to face with God and Christianity,

the most important thing in life, on a day to day basis. That was

their primary role and cannot be displaced. They were the teachers,

and the organizers of social-religous life. They kept the calendar.

They officiated in decicive moments in peoples lives: baptism to last

rites.

 

THOSE WHO WORKED

The peasants. Those who worked on the land. slaves in frontier

regions, to prosperous free farmers. Many people drifted to castle

regions, to farm. Castles were put where rivers are, where church is,

cemetary (an anchor of the community in a way we forget). All that was

there, and it was nice to be there for a farmer.

 

Peasants were serfs sometimes, but not always. A manor was an estate

where one part was for the benefit of the manorial lord. The other

part was worked by the peasants who lived there for themselves. The

demean (for the lord) was 25-40%. So, clergy and laymen could do their

thing, and their land was worked by serfs. You have an estate and

people worked it for you, letting you do your job.

 

Greedy aristocrats wanted money to buy trade goods, and they then

commuted your peasants work into wages. Serfs became free in France

and England by buying with money their freedom. The lot of those who

lived in a village was not bad. They worked 250 days out of the year,

they worshipped together, and the social life was everyday. Lots of

free time for celebration, many holidays (in their holy sense) time

for market and festivals. Not that bad.

 

 

MEDIEVAL POLITICAL TRADITIONS: ENGLAND AND FRANCE (36)

Theme: failure to develop a stable map

Theme: failure to elaborate strong central government institutions

Theme: 1. expansion of governmental activity in space across Europe

(to slavic etc.)

          2. expansion of government activity within particular states, more

present now

Theme: changes in who governs

 

ENGLAND 600s-1300s

small and homogeneous made it easier, less complex

small early anglo saxon kingdoms had self rule (heptarchy)

fighting with vikings in 793 and during 9C. sporadic and not decicive,

here and there.

 

865: great army under Alfred the Great comes back and Alfred becomes a

national monarch. Moved vikings (danish) up north. Alfred's successors

moved them further, all the way to York (a viking name), called the

Danelaw.

 

In 900s Denmark and Norway est. states, vikings were freebooting. In

10C they formalized attacks on England and it was conquered by Sven

Forkbeard whose son Canute came to rule England (1016-1035), and was a

great one. Later, son of the last anglo saxon king returned, Edward

the Confessor. But, he had no heir, and took a vow of chastity. At

different times he recognized different successors! So a bunch of guys

want to be king. One is Harold of Wessex, another is William the

Bastard (of Normandy) and the king of Denmark (another Harold- who

claims to succeed Canute!).

 

Harold from Denmark invades, and Harold of Wessex marches and defeats

him, then Harold marches south and meets William the Bastard

(Conquerer) and in Oct. 1066 was defeated at the Battle of Hastings.

This conquest is a culmination of 200 years of Norman (Northmen)

(Norsemen) attacks on England! Well they got it.

 

Problem: William doesn't forget about Normandy. He retains interest in

it, and begins a centuries long problem: Kings of England hold

territories in France, which will culminate in the 100 Years War.

 

Another Problem: William's son succeeded him. Henry I died without

issue (but had daughter), and then grandson came from France, and he

died without heir (Steven I). In 1154 Henry II of Anjou, son of

daughter of Henry I became king, but he also married Eleanor of

Acquitane. So, he is now the Count of Anjou, King of England, and

controls Normandy through mother, Acquitane through his wife, and some

other stuff too. Bizarre situation that now he his King of England and

60% of France.

 

John I succeeds him, soft-sword and lackland (lacks the land of his

father) who stupidly provokes the king of France and war occurs and

most of England's French holdings are taken. Clarifies, but produced

an aggrieved England. Basic shape of England didn't change much,

except in Wales and Scotland, but too early for that.

 

Little kingdom of england held its shape pretty well.

FRANCE

Last Caroligians (Capetians) were stripped of everything but Ile de

France. They then expanded again, learned how to meddle (Louis VII and

Philip II drove Henry II crazy meddling with his sons, who were

supposed to be helping him.

 

Philip II defeats John and secures much of France again... and in 13C

the monarch extends to southeast by campaigning against heretics. a

"French" territorial state emerges, but is complex. De Gaulle: "Its

impossible to govern a country with 325 kinds of cheese".

 

ENGLAND'S GOVERNMENT

a court is set up, the shireves (shire representitives, our sheriffs).

taxes collected, at first to pay off vikings when they came, and then

they kept collecting taxes after they were gone anyway!

 

William advanced all this, and did not upset anything. He improved on

it: Domesday survey was the best till the modern US census. He wanted

to know what he had. Pigs, mills, people, chickens...

 

Henry I promoted the exchequer. From checkerboard cloth they were

reckoned on. Royal finances. Also, justices were sent out to extend

the royal authority throughout the realm. Like Charlemagne did, but in

England, it would stick.

 

Royal courts applied what came to be known as Common Law.

 

Other nobles were upset by some of this, because they had less of a

part while royals had more. Well, Henry I, Henry II and John did was

bring urban men and later university men to their court. Middle

classes were more loyal to the court, cause they were "made" by the

king and could be unmade by him!

 

King John does one amazing thing, prodded by the nobles: he signs the

Magna Carta. The great charter. "The King is not above the law".

Answerable like everyone else. Nobles checked the kings feudalism.

 

FEUDALISM

Well, it wasn't so tidy like in the textbooks. Pyramid, of lord and

vassals and vassals of them and finally peasants. True, and vassals

swore homage and fealty (not harming the interests of the lord).

Vassals were given a fief. If we think of all 1000 years of medieval

history and the huge range from Ireland to Moscow, there was no

"feudalism" understood. It was an element, and thats it.

 

So what did John do? He outrageously abused his feudal

responsibilities. One was that if a son was underage, he was supposed

to take care of it till he came of age, then invest him. Well John

just kept lands. When a vassal died with only a daughter, she had to

be arranged marriage so a vassal would be there. John kept the land.

So he had to sign the Magna Carta, to show he would "play by the

rules." Think of a sports game without a handbook.

 

13C ENGLAND: THE PARLIAMENT

John signs Magna Carta, and the nobles get some ability to marshall

the right positions to rule, while kings want to stack the council so

they can control it with 'their men.' Always this flux. Always

enemies, always friends.

 

In 1295 some powerful nobles + high clergy and maybe some burghers

came to "talk" in London... (talk= parliamont in French) a place to

talk they needed... and so they formed a "parliament." A group of

people who imagined themselves to represent the country to the king.

No idea when it would meet or what it would do, but it was there. Not

democratic of course, but a notion of something there to advise the

king on behalf of the country.

 

MINISTERS

Also, king's "ministers" find their start: used to be that a

'treasurer' takes care of the kings personal finances. Now they are

more public and take care of the kingdom's finances. Clerics prepare

formal correspondence of the king, and the kingdom, and are called the

chancellory.  Public officers. Transport officer (Constable, stable,

horses, horses that take you to different parts of the realm)... helps

the king go around the country to visit, and others to check on local

conditions. Eventually he becomes the chief military and police

officer (cause he knows best what's goin on 'out there.' Eventually,

branch offices emerged for all this in other cities.

 

FRANCE: A STABLE MONARCHY

One family, the Capets, the Capetain Dynasty starts in 987 with Hugh

Capet, ends in 1328, and produced a saint, St. Louis IX. Great

prestige for the monarchy.

No Magna Carta here, they used non-feudal policies. Their gov't was

stronger than in England. No local elite in France. Less cohecive in

France. Each had found the territorial limits of their states, and

they had two models of gov't: 1 in england where the king was checked.

and 2) france where monarchy did not share power. Which was normative

for Europe? neither one! We'll have more complexity and richness than

this!

 

 

 

==========

 

THE EXPANSION OF EUROPE (34) (THE THAW-900-1300)

But the carolingian world was battered by muslims magyars and vikings!

But it was divided in the 9th Century! But the high middle ages begin.

The Thaw. Bouyant optimism. Europe's optimism strikes out against its

neighbors in the crusades.

 

New States: A great arc of new states: from the Celtic world --

through Scandinavia and through the Slavic world.

 

Economic growth, architectural dynamism: the romanesque and then the

gothic, all over Europe. Unpredictable in 800.

 

This 900 through 1300 was one of the longest periods of sustained

growth (in nearly all aspects of life) in human history. Remarkable,

and became the background for the cultural achievements.

 

Why did it happen? 1) Rise in population. During Carolingian period,

pop rose (750s - 1050), and even more 1050-1200. leveled off in 1300.

So, larger families. More babies surviving, people living longer. no

plague or famine. warm dry climate. lots of new land was brought under

cultivation (not for no reason, to feed mouths). Diets got better,

crops  were good: full of iron and protean. Cereal production. They

invented the best farming before the advent of fertilization. How?

Horses were implemented as draft animal replacing the Ox. he does more

work, is stronger, for less food. fields plowed more times, soil

turned easier. different harnessing, horse collar. hooves of horses

had to be shod... but gave protection to the horse's hooves. But if we

are gonna shoe these guys, we need iron. metallurgy. Heavy wheeled

plow invented in the Slavic world. took up in western europe too. used

in 11th century. good because horse can do more work, and was much

better than roman scratchplow. aerates soil better. more iron needed.

smithing. water mills used since 11th C: mills demanded engineering

gains in gears. A flow of water can push a parallel wheel, but not

well. A perpendicular wheel can work better, but i must do some

hydralic engineering! think swiss family robinson. we need mills cause

of grain... all circular! population, grain (bread), grinding, water

wheel, land farming...

 

And Land use: during classical times, an area was farmed intensely

then move a few miles. farm, move. now they farmed same land, but 2

field agriculture. farm half and let animals eat and dump the other

half. enrichment. household waste put there too. half of land one

year, half another. Carolingians used 3-field on church and

carolingian estates. This spreads all over by the year 1000 or 1050,

everyone uses it. Divide land into 3 equal parts, one is fallow, one

planted with winter crops, one planted with spring crops. From 50% to

66% right away, and a better cycle. one lost crop wont wipe you out.

 

People eat oats in Brittany and Scotland only. horses eat oats. i need

some oats too. this is a problem, but now with 3 field i can grow oats

for the horses too.

 

Also, agricultural specialization increases. People in areas with

viticulture grew grapes and grapevines. Others cereal grains, and if a

given region is going to specialize... then they will rely on trade to

get the things they don't do. trade... roads... 4 wheeled wagons, no

more two wheeled cart... and far flung urban markets to buy into the

economy of the country.

 

technological innovation. Roman period saw not much tech increase, but

Medieval period did. flip the polarity of Roman Light - Medieval Dark!

Evidence?

 

Church and secular govt. encouraged trade and protected it. And after

the crusades, other products from far away, spices etc. would become

luxury products. The medieval trading infrastructure develops

further... into the modern. Inference on pop. increase? yes. But but

the train of inferences is a sound one.

 

ECONOMICS

Fairs! Champagne's summer fair moved from town to town there in

Champagne, from the south and north both. Centers for growth of trade.

all overland until 14C., but on rivers and roads. After 14th C by

ship. Other fairs? Niznhy Novgorod. Hansa in baltic. england's south

had a league of cities too. commercial interests were looked after.

contracts are a byproduct of this stuff- partnership and corporations

too! "if we work together we can pool wealth and be stronger than one

by ourselves: and risk is spread out: if i own a share in a ship and

the ship sinks, ive lost something. If I own the ship, I lose

everything. Insurance was sold as well as a subsidiary. Productively

parasitical things grew and spread. Entrapraneurship.

 

Commercial networks emerge. Hanseatic League: Britain to Russia. Up

and down the Rhine, Danube and Rhone, these were networks too. Italian

cities linked up too, had networks in Mediterranean. Eastern

Mediterranean went through central asia to china, and seabourn routes.

Riverine routes too.

 

Surface mining. No deep mining cause you could not get the water out

of the shafts. you just couldnt. But surface mining was ok, and it was

like quarrying. Not metal but stone. Look at the Medieval churches :

all stone in 12 and 13C. Iron though, was one metal that was mined

for.

 

TOWNS

Money went into circulation, more money. Towns. Fairs. Early medieval

town were there cause there was a count there (governmental see) or a

cathedral town (bishop's see), or a monestary was there. Some grew

furburgs (suburbs) gathered on edge during Carolingian time. Then

merchants began to settle permenantly there. And town air breaths free

(see gierard). towns are economic engines driving the growth of

Europe. trade and industry (artisan industry), tanning etc. along with

gov't and religious centers, and now intellectual university centers,

they took on the life of people and economics.

 

Town people need different things. peace, security, order, predictable

raw materials, supplies of materials. Peace in the countryside too,

something that swashbuckling nobles were not too interested in. But

city walls went up and grew. These changed economic circumstances

purduced reflection on life and economics: people knew more about rich

vs. poor. new religious orders came in to minister to the poor.

 

Usury was needed now, to raise capital. if i am gonna loan you money

for your business, i want something in return. theologians justified

it finally by saying you were paying for 'risk', not for borrowing

their money. also, what is the just price? whatever the market will

bear? whatever i can get away with? cost of goods plus labor that went

into it?

 

So, Europe in the high middle ages was dynamic and prosperous, more so

than anytime since pax romana, and would be again in modern times.

 

Remember: when you study the West, you are doing something heroic for

our civilization and its preservation.

 

 

CHIVALRY (35)

who are these people? we see there are more of them, and they were

being more prosperous. King Alfred the Great said "a kingdom needs men

who fight, men who pray and men who work." 3 classes therefore. this

left out townpeople, though they were a dynamic feature. to Work was

to work the soil, not the tanners in town. Women? no, minorities? no.

This was a christendom thing.

 

THOSE WHO FIGHT

the nobility. royal families only the most distinctive of the many

noble families from all over the realm. Primogeniture rule: first born

sons get the title and inheritance. Lineage is now a huge deal: who

are your great ancestors? What about the other kids? No title or

office, or land endowment for everyone, so many young sons are cut

loose and they go into towns, clergy, or... crusades.

 

Also, now great families tried to create compact chunks of land, with

a large residence, and take a surname from the land or castle they

built. A self consciousness of belonging to a family or place.

 

Several noble levels: king and truly great nobles: people who could

operate on the kingdom wide scale. Then local powerful families... and

then knights. Knights had to find a lord to support them, to work to

find an office... or younger sons of the high status family. Nobility

was the governing class of Europe. Monopolized office holding in state

and in church. Served under kings and as a bridge between kings and

peasants. They had the ethos of Chivalry. Chival is a horse.

"Horsiness" code of conduct appropriate to men who ride and have

horses. A code of men for men, not men for women, that is later on.

Prowess. A warrior who was not a good soldier was useless. Didn't

matter if you were a 'nice guy'. You had to have battle prowess.

Loyalty, generousness, and courage. Give things freely in this world,

be brave in battle.

 

SONG OF ROLAND

We can see this code of conduct in the Song of Roland. The French

national epic, and we know the event that stands behind it... in 778

Charlemagne fought raiders in northern spain, and on the way back over

the pyrannes Basque terrorists stole his baggage. 300 years later that

event was chronicled in the Song of Roland (the guy guarding the

baggage). The equivalent to the action movie of the middle ages. Meant

to appeal to men and boys like that. The same demographic. Great

Roland dies, the fiancee dies of sadness right away. Long loving

descriptions of weapons- guy stuff like guys talking about their golf

clubs or cars. This is the ethos of chivalry.

 

THOSE WHO PRAY

The clergy (everyone prayed) but the pros here... but problem: are

monks or bishops closer to God? Well, it was some or another of the

clergy anyway. Clergy became more and more aristocratic, pulled from

aristocratic families. The noble 2nd sons of great families, again,

was one reason. Secure life, decent diet, nice place to live, enormous

prestige, good education... not bad! Very desirable career. Convents

provided opportunities for women. Women governed other women, were

educated, and acceptable alternative lifestyle to marriage... a

convent was a desirable place for many many women.

 

The state is Christendom, so clergy is very important. They had good

connections. Clergy shares the same values as nobility, because these

are the families they are from, and they still have uncles dads

brothers etc. there! When we encounter "worldly" clergy in literature,

we say "hmm, these clergy do not seem to be living a particularly holy

life..." well they weren't, they were sharing the culture and values

of the nobility! Living the kind of life people of their class lived!

 

Clergy was hierarchical, pope, bishops, priests, and encouraged that

in society, king, lords, vassals.

 

CLUNY AND REFORMS

In 910 a monestary was founded by William of Acquitine, free of all

lay control, even of the family who founded it, and placed under the

jurisdiction of the pope. It had abbots of enormous prestige, and it

came to exert a large amount of influence on monestaries all over

Europe. It was called Cluny. In the 10C, like Gortsau in Lorraine,

Hirtsau in Germany, Worchester, England, powerful Cluniak reforms went

around. "The essential telos of religous office is to leave, to

abandon the world and its troubles. The church should be uncoupled

from the state totally." Others from inside said, "No! Role of clergy

is to engage the world, engage the powerful and get them to change

things for the better."

 

1. Cistercian monks (from Cito in France) were a strict reform. "Cluny

is too worldly! Go back to the Rule of St. Benedict and follow it in

its purest form. St. Bernard of Clairveaux was the great figure from

here, in 11C.

 

Aramitic (Hermit) monks in Italy, France and England, really tried to

physically separate selves from the world.

Canons (who work in cathedral churches) worked to make cathedrals more

like monestaries.

 

Crusades had a weird fighters: a particularly medieval phenemenon:

armed knights who were monks. Knights Templars, Knights Hospitallers.

Teutonic Knights. Followed a 'Rule'.

 

Mendicants: begging order. Franciscans were these, people would live

without wealth, without marks of status, or prestige, worked with the

poor and sick and downtrodden. By leading blameless lives, could have

a reach that powerful, rich and worldly could not.

 

Mendicants: Dominicans worked with heretics and those who fell away

from the teachings of the church.

 

Soldier of Christ is the best medieval soldier. He who will only fight

in a good cause, fighting God's enemies. in 10C they promoted the

peace of God, "no war during Christmas or Easter, no war on Sunday, no

war in or near a Church, no war on civilians.

 

This legitimated the Crusades.

 

Well, clergy brought people face to face with God and Christianity,

the most important thing in life, on a day to day basis. That was

their primary role and cannot be displaced. They were the teachers,

and the organizers of social-religous life. They kept the calendar.

They officiated in decicive moments in peoples lives: baptism to last

rites.

 

THOSE WHO WORKED

The peasants. Those who worked on the land. slaves in frontier

regions, to prosperous free farmers. Many people drifted to castle

regions, to farm. Castles were put where rivers are, where church is,

cemetary (an anchor of the community in a way we forget). All that was

there, and it was nice to be there for a farmer.

 

Peasants were serfs sometimes, but not always. A manor was an estate

where one part was for the benefit of the manorial lord. The other

part was worked by the peasants who lived there for themselves. The

demean (for the lord) was 25-40%. So, clergy and laymen could do their

thing, and their land was worked by serfs. You have an estate and

people worked it for you, letting you do your job.

 

Greedy aristocrats wanted money to buy trade goods, and they then

commuted your peasants work into wages. Serfs became free in France

and England by buying with money their freedom. The lot of those who

lived in a village was not bad. They worked 250 days out of the year,

they worshipped together, and the social life was everyday. Lots of

free time for celebration, many holidays (in their holy sense) time

for market and festivals. Not that bad.

 

===============

 

MEDIEVAL POLITICAL TRADITIONS: ENGLAND AND FRANCE (36)

Theme: failure to develop a stable map

Theme: failure to elaborate strong central government institutions

Theme: 1. expansion of governmental activity in space across Europe

(to slavic etc.)

          2. expansion of government activity within particular states, more

present now

Theme: changes in who governs

 

ENGLAND 600s-1300s

small and homogeneous made it easier, less complex

small early anglo saxon kingdoms had self rule (heptarchy)

fighting with vikings in 793 and during 9C. sporadic and not decicive,

here and there.

 

865: great army under Alfred the Great comes back and Alfred becomes a

national monarch. Moved vikings (danish) up north. Alfred's successors

moved them further, all the way to York (a viking name), called the

Danelaw.

 

In 900s Denmark and Norway est. states, vikings were freebooting. In

10C they formalized attacks on England and it was conquered by Sven

Forkbeard whose son Canute came to rule England (1016-1035), and was a

great one. Later, son of the last anglo saxon king returned, Edward

the Confessor. But, he had no heir, and took a vow of chastity. At

different times he recognized different successors! So a bunch of guys

want to be king. One is Harold of Wessex, another is William the

Bastard (of Normandy) and the king of Denmark (another Harold- who

claims to succeed Canute!).

 

Harold from Denmark invades, and Harold of Wessex marches and defeats

him, then Harold marches south and meets William the Bastard

(Conquerer) and in Oct. 1066 was defeated at the Battle of Hastings.

This conquest is a culmination of 200 years of Norman (Northmen)

(Norsemen) attacks on England! Well they got it.

 

Problem: William doesn't forget about Normandy. He retains interest in

it, and begins a centuries long problem: Kings of England hold

territories in France, which will culminate in the 100 Years War.

 

Another Problem: William's son succeeded him. Henry I died without

issue (but had daughter), and then grandson came from France, and he

died without heir (Steven I). In 1154 Henry II of Anjou, son of

daughter of Henry I became king, but he also married Eleanor of

Acquitane. So, he is now the Count of Anjou, King of England, and

controls Normandy through mother, Acquitane through his wife, and some

other stuff too. Bizarre situation that now he his King of England and

60% of France.

 

John I succeeds him, soft-sword and lackland (lacks the land of his

father) who stupidly provokes the king of France and war occurs and

most of England's French holdings are taken. Clarifies, but produced

an aggrieved England. Basic shape of England didn't change much,

except in Wales and Scotland, but too early for that.

 

Little kingdom of england held its shape pretty well.

FRANCE

Last Caroligians (Capetians) were stripped of everything but Ile de

France. They then expanded again, learned how to meddle (Louis VII and

Philip II drove Henry II crazy meddling with his sons, who were

supposed to be helping him.

 

Philip II defeats John and secures much of France again... and in 13C

the monarch extends to southeast by campaigning against heretics. a

"French" territorial state emerges, but is complex. De Gaulle: "Its

impossible to govern a country with 325 kinds of cheese".

 

ENGLAND'S GOVERNMENT

a court is set up, the shireves (shire representitives, our sheriffs).

taxes collected, at first to pay off vikings when they came, and then

they kept collecting taxes after they were gone anyway!

 

William advanced all this, and did not upset anything. He improved on

it: Domesday survey was the best till the modern US census. He wanted

to know what he had. Pigs, mills, people, chickens...

 

Henry I promoted the exchequer. From checkerboard cloth they were

reckoned on. Royal finances. Also, justices were sent out to extend

the royal authority throughout the realm. Like Charlemagne did, but in

England, it would stick.

 

Royal courts applied what came to be known as Common Law.

 

Other nobles were upset by some of this, because they had less of a

part while royals had more. Well, Henry I, Henry II and John did was

bring urban men and later university men to their court. Middle

classes were more loyal to the court, cause they were "made" by the

king and could be unmade by him!

 

King John does one amazing thing, prodded by the nobles: he signs the

Magna Carta. The great charter. "The King is not above the law".

Answerable like everyone else. Nobles checked the kings feudalism.

 

FEUDALISM

Well, it wasn't so tidy like in the textbooks. Pyramid, of lord and

vassals and vassals of them and finally peasants. True, and vassals

swore homage and fealty (not harming the interests of the lord).

Vassals were given a fief. If we think of all 1000 years of medieval

history and the huge range from Ireland to Moscow, there was no

"feudalism" understood. It was an element, and thats it.

 

So what did John do? He outrageously abused his feudal

responsibilities. One was that if a son was underage, he was supposed

to take care of it till he came of age, then invest him. Well John

just kept lands. When a vassal died with only a daughter, she had to

be arranged marriage so a vassal would be there. John kept the land.

So he had to sign the Magna Carta, to show he would "play by the

rules." Think of a sports game without a handbook.

 

13C ENGLAND: THE PARLIAMENT

John signs Magna Carta, and the nobles get some ability to marshall

the right positions to rule, while kings want to stack the council so

they can control it with 'their men.' Always this flux. Always

enemies, always friends.

 

In 1295 some powerful nobles + high clergy and maybe some burghers

came to "talk" in London... (talk= parliamont in French) a place to

talk they needed... and so they formed a "parliament." A group of

people who imagined themselves to represent the country to the king.

No idea when it would meet or what it would do, but it was there. Not

democratic of course, but a notion of something there to advise the

king on behalf of the country.

 

MINISTERS

Also, king's "ministers" find their start: used to be that a

'treasurer' takes care of the kings personal finances. Now they are

more public and take care of the kingdom's finances. Clerics prepare

formal correspondence of the king, and the kingdom, and are called the

chancellory.  Public officers. Transport officer (Constable, stable,

horses, horses that take you to different parts of the realm)... helps

the king go around the country to visit, and others to check on local

conditions. Eventually he becomes the chief military and police

officer (cause he knows best what's goin on 'out there.' Eventually,

branch offices emerged for all this in other cities.

 

FRANCE: A STABLE MONARCHY

One family, the Capets, the Capetain Dynasty starts in 987 with Hugh

Capet, ends in 1328, and produced a saint, St. Louis IX. Great

prestige for the monarchy.

No Magna Carta here, they used non-feudal policies. Their gov't was

stronger than in England. No local elite in France. Less cohecive in

France. Each had found the territorial limits of their states, and

they had two models of gov't: 1 in england where the king was checked.

and 2) france where monarchy did not share power. Which was normative

for Europe? neither one! We'll have more complexity and richness than

this!

 

IBERIA

Germany and others were not a centralizing trend but this was not seen

as retrograde, only by us. border changes were always happening. In

90s yugoslavia exploded and germany united. changes still happen all

the time.

 

In Iberia, an Islamic state was built when Abbasids came to the

caliphate in Baghdad, since spain fell away. The cordoba regime failed

and by 1000, small autonomous regions were loosely connected to the

emir who ruled from cordoba. Late in 700s a movement in the north was

launched, the reconquista. It begins in ernest in the 1000s, when

Sancho I of Navarre started fighting, to no avail, but centruy after

century after century, this was the chief issue.

 

But also culture: muslim christian jew all lived in one country.

Sancho died in 1035 and his sons got castille and aragon, which would

lead the reconquista. Castillian forces in 1085 took Toledo. Great

moral victory. Winning man was Rodrigo Diaz of Navarre, El Cid. The

Master. Took money from everyone and fought on all sides, but when it

counted he was with the Christians. In 12C Muslims called in forces

from North Africa... reqonquest halted.

 

Interestingly some Crusaders in 1139 landed in Lisbon and opened a new

front in reconquest. By 13C pope Innocent III called for a renewal and

in 1212 the turning point came. No doubt. In 1492 it finished.

 

Iberia was an east and central dominated place, Aragon became a major

power, Barcelona was its main city. Castille had a territorial

monarchy like England. Portugal was a little behind.

 

IRELAND

Vikings disrupted in early medieval times, Dublin founded by Northmen

to set out from against the dozens of tiny kingdoms.

 

Slowly, Irish decided to unite vs. Vikings, and Brian Boruoo rallied

the Irish. Church develops in Ireland. In 1100s king rory o connor

turned to england for mercinaries, asked henry II to help him exert

wider control. backfired: henry II invaded in 1171 and the english

have never really left! North Ireland - they are still there!

 

So, started with viking disruption and ended with english intrusion,

and politically fragmented.

 

POLAND

Promising beginnings: Polish kingdom in 900s, well governed and

anchored in western orbit, not byzantine. Poland went for Rome, opened

possibilities with cooperation with Germanys and Otto. But then in

1138 Boleslaw III divided the kingdom and weakened the country,

opening it to the outside meddling.

 

RUSSIA

In Rus, remote ancestor of Russia, Viking Varangians from Sweden came

in 862 and expanded, and met Byzantium, and accepted orthodox

christianity. It had alternating weak and strong rulers, aristocratic

factionalism, and was gradually incurred by steppe attacks, finally

the Mongols in 13C.

 

ITALY

No Italy, it didn't exist except as a geographic definition. 3 zones:

South + Sicily was subject to outside influence. Byzantines were

powerful in 7C, in 9C the Muslims attacked and took it, in 11C the

same restless Normans who came to England and brought a Crusade to

Iberia, came to Muslim dominated southern Italy and attacked as well,

carving out a Norman kingdom! It was supplanted by a German kingdom

and finally by Aragon. It was a rich region, mini-Iberia culturally:

Christian, Muslim and Jewish worlds were together.

 

Central Italy: Rome and Papal States, emerged in 8C with Carolingian

assistance. Always expanding and contracting. Always changing.

 

North Italy: Towns. A creative different way. Carolingians put and end

to Lombard control in 8C, but Carolingian authority lasted into 10C,

when the Holy Roman Germans came. Attempts by this or that town or

league to throw out the Germans made a divided and urbanized region,

where the towns were independent minded. No german counts! No... pope?

Yes, and our town = a commune- the common thing... a mechanism for the

leading town elements to exercise their will, not democratic. Players:

elites from the countryside came into the town, and had to share power

with butcher, baker and candlestick maker. Popolo (the people) were

artisans and merchants in town. So, from Germanic control to shared

local power.

 

Well, by 1300 the cycle comes back from ancient times: Italian

communes are ruled by oligarchy --> increasing mob rule --> despotic

ruler, to bring them back to order. So despotic situation.

 

GERMAN TERRITORIES

German lands were outside Roman empire: no heritage of towns and

roads, no organized government. Carolingians extended authority into

German lands, but power was short in time span, and so German lands

were still very rural until late. 5% of german land was being

cultivated! No deep permenant sense of authority and institutions.

 

After Carolingians, the 5 german dukes elected the duke of Saxony to

be the king. The "Ottos" of Saxony build the strongest state of 10C

Europe. In 955 they defeated the powerful Magyars, and built prestige

by being crowned emperors in carolingian tradition... they had

something that no other ruler in Europe had! Promising... from 10C

vantage point, it looked like Germany was on its way... but it fell

apart. Used diplomacy and outright intimidation on other dukes and on

neighbors.

 

But it failed because military expansion ended... dyanasties ended

rapidly, 1002, 1024, 1125, 1250. No continuity of rule, but that isn't

devestating always... in england they got by it. But rulers did not

rule all the duchies, because the king is not totally sovereign in all

5 duchies. 1 certainly (saxony), 1 or 2 others yes, but usually 1 or 2

no. foreign entanglements in italy bogged down german affairs, and

finally, the struggle with the popes.

 

INVESTITURE PROBLEM: KINGS VS POPES

Who gives (invests) ecclesiastical offices? King or Pope? Big problem.

In 11C, A reformed papacy believed that lay investiture in church

affairs was the chief blockade to moral development in Europe. German

emperors felt themselves divinely appointed, however, and saw heaven

as a monarchy, and the best reflection of the heavenly kingdom on

Earth was they as divinely inspired monarchs should decide and run

ecclesiastical affairs. Well, eventually the popes won out over the

ottonians in 11th. each key prop of Ottonian rule was kicked out from

under it, and Germany split up into Holy Roman territories.

 

THE ROMAN CHURCH'S HIGH MEDIEVAL DEVELOPMENT

Sophisticated legal system, curia was the central court of the church,

the council senate was the college of cardinals. The lateran council

(st. john lateran is Rome's cathedral church) became europe-wide

parliaments! 4th Lateran Council met in 1215 and exterted more

influence on people than any other unit in Europe! And would be the

most significant thing for people until Council of Trent in 16C. More

people were broguht into conact with church officials. Punishments

elaborated: excommunication became a kind of social death: exclusion

of an individual from social and sacaremntal life. no eating with, no

sex with, no tallking to someone excommunicated person. Interdict

denied sacaramental services in a region. People were left bereft of

their sacraments and they then convinced their ruler to bend to the

church's will. Inquisition. A formal judicial prodedure which operated

according to Roman law to seek and destroy heresy.

 

So, by High Medieval Times, a group of actors in Europe drawing on

Roman, Christian and Feudal Germanic or local traditions emerged, with

immense creativity that leaves us standing gape jawed. some lands had

strong central gov't, some weak. no single ordering principle!

European diversity was very strong. Forms of gov't even differed! Yet,

this was the Age of the Expansion of Europe.

 

 

==================

Now go back